Things to Remember When Writing a Philosophy Dissertation

The essential things to be aware of when creating a philosophy dissertation are the logical fallacies. A philosophy dissertation, more than any other kind of dissertation, should have a firm logical construction, free from the common errors in reasoning that we have become so familiar with in daily conversation. In all scientific dissertations, whether they be scientific research papers or philosophy dissertations, those erroneous deductions are taboo. The article collection that ProfEssays.com maintains for public reading contain many examples of philosophical dissertations. If you will read them, you are most likely to discover one which will be fine for you to use as a model in your philosophy dissertation.

ProfEssays.com offers one of the highest services with respect to providing academic and professional assistance in creating custom essays and personal essays. All you need to have when you ask for their technical assistance in writing will be the rough draft or even just an outline of your thoughts about the essay topic. Their productions are famous for the professionalism that goes into them. Top quality and perfect originality, combined with the strictest adherence to the client’s requirements, are happily met in each and all of their works. ProfEssays.com is dedicated to promoting literary awareness in everyone.

The following are some of the logical fallacies to be avoided in a philosophy dissertation:

1. The slippery slope fallacy is one we commonly meet with in every interactions with people. It affirms that one move or action will result in a consecutive sequence of effects that will lead to a significant final condition. For instance, you might hear someone say “If you could only lend me $2000.00, I would put up a commercial website that will earn a lot, and return the money to you with 20 percent interest in two months.”
2. Begging the question provides reasons for a condition, and the reasons are identical to the condition, as in; “Eating that food is unhealthy for you because it’s going to make you sick,” in which cause and effect are identical.
3. The Argument to Ignorance fallacy claims an idea to be true because no proof is immediately available of its falsity. An example of this would be: “Because the World Bank is now effectively controlling most of world trade, it has become an institution to be respected as well as feared,” which forces the reader to assume that the reason is true in order to be able to agree to the conclusion. Unless the writer furnishes believable supportive evidence for his claim that the World Bank controls world trade, the reasoning is fallacious.

As mentioned, the skilled providers at ProfEssays.com are committed to quality and in the act of rewriting your philosophy dissertation, they are duty bound to inform you of such logical errors in your draft so you can correct them as soon as possible. Your interests are their interests. This is clear; from their friendly prices, through their attentive services, to the free revisions that are allowed after you receive your paper, and most of all in the strict confidentiality of your transaction.